One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia-Marquez (Week 8)

Wow, what a novel. I'm so happy we read this in class because I have been wanting to read it for ages. The second half of the book really went in a direction I wasn't expecting with the political tensions, introduction of the modern labour workforces, and discussions of agrarian reforms. The continuation of the Buendia family line also provided a really thought provoking reading experience.  

The farther and father I got into the book, as more characters got introduced it became harder to keep them all straight because of their identical names. This gave me a lot of confusion and made all of the characters mesh into one large confusing character for me, with different plot points and personality traits of some characters getting carried over to others amongst the confusion. The intentionality of this has been making me really ponder the message behind Garcia Marquez's rationale in writing this way. Is it to show how much our family impacts ourselves? Does it show our lack on individuality in society or our families? Building on the messages with the banana tres, does it comment to how outsiders view those in rural foreign communities as all the same and without individuality or differing features? Or does it illustrate the time loop of Macondo and it’s slow process of development?

I also found it interesting how the Aureliano and Arcardio names kept constantly repeating throughout the family history, but Ursula's didn't (other than Amarantha Ursuala...I believe?). Considering she was one of the few characters that expanded the entire novel I thought it odd that her name wasn't carried more from generation to generation. 

Moving onto the next thing that really surprised me was the banana company. This was by far my favourite aspect of the novel. I remember reading about the banana massacre of 1928 and the soft power exploits of the United Fruit Company, so I was super intrigued about why Garcia Marquez chose to include parallel problems in this book. Saying that the workers were coming "because everyone was coming" (229) and calling it "the banana plague" (229) was really making a statement on the destruction that colonization and foreign intervention causes to a community in the fight for it's resources. To see this plot point get introduced right at the shifting point into modernity in the novel was telling timing. To me, it also made a statement about who was in control of the town's future. The inhabitants that have been controlling Macondo since it's creation or those who come in uninvited and disrupt the lives of those in the community? It also seemed to kind of break the endless time loop within the town with the introduction of war, conflict, and death suffered by the young. Not to mention all the labour issues that those who worked with the banana company experienced. 

I understand why this novel is considered to be one that everyone should read. It really makes you think about the role that family plays in shaping us, how we shape societies outside our own, and how societies have changed over time with the introduction of modern invention and technology. Even though it was published in 1967, the magical and relevant aspects of it makes it seem as applicable now as it was upon it's first publication. 

Question for the class: What do you think the reason of repetitive and similar names was in the novel? What point was Garcia Marquez trying to make?

One Hundred Years of Solitude by Gabriel Garcia Márquez (Week 7)

I've had One Hundred Years of Solitude on my reading list for a really long time, so I was really excited to see it on the list of readings for the term. There are several strong themes that I noted while reading the first part of the novel. The first themes that stuck out to me were time and memory. The way the book jumps around and bends the idea of time while staying in the perceived present narrative was confusing to read, but that was part of the fun. The confusion made me think about how time is subjective and while we may have the shared marks that clocks and calendars bring, it is through our memories that we humanize and perceive time. To have time both appear linear and sporadic through the novel takes true artistry. 

Another thing that seemed to purposely confuse me and play with time was the repetition of the family name. Since most of the characters have the same or similar names, it really emphased the point that Macondo is stuck in some sort of time loop (I'll address this point further later). It also builds on the theme of family as well and how important memory plays into familial tradition. By instilling the same name, it ensures that memories and stories continue to pass on throughout the generations in a place (or time?) where there is no technology (other than the camera later introduced) to assist in this. It also adds to the traditional setting of Macondo. The chapter where the village experiences a plague of insomnia (and amnesia?) and falls into chaos is another reference to how much Macondo's community is built around memory. 

Speaking of tradition, the other themes I took note of while reading were progress and modernity. There is a part at the beginning of the book where Jose takes notice of a town outside of his own and proclaims that "there are all kinds of magical instruments while we keep living like donkeys" (8). This sentence really stood out to me because it made an example of the people and/or communities that got/are getting left out on the path to modernity that is crossing Latin America. The time loop also emphasis this point that Macondo is stuck in a fixed state of past, present, and future that outside influences can't alter and the villagers can't escape. It is only through the incoming presence of war and colonization does the village narrative and reality seem to change. I don't really know the point that Garcia Marquez was trying to get at here, but to me, this points to the problem where modernity in Latin America has been dictated by foreign intervention. When Jose is the only person in the beginning wanting to venture past the sheltered Macondo, it shows the lack of awareness (or indifference? Purposeful avoidance?) that many experience(d) through the age of modernity. While it has been said many times that history has been written by the "privileged" (aka colonizers), it also exemplifies how the future is being written this way as well.  

I wanted to talk a little about how the novel showcases different kinds of love, however, after reading more, perhaps I will talk about this in the next blog post. I'm really excited to keep reading as this is a very gripping and thought provoking novel. 

Question for the class: How does time influence your memory or vice versa? Do you perceive time through memories? Do you think Garcia's usage of time enhances the story?

Pedro Paramo by Juan Rulfo (Week 6)

I’m not going to lie, this book was one of the most confusing, yet compelling books I’ve read. Out of all the books I’ve read so far this semester, I found this one to be the most mentally challenging (yes, even more than Borges). A lot of energy was spent trying to piece together and separate between Juan and Pedro’s narratives while also deducing between the relevant side characters. Maybe I’m dumb, but the intentional difference between the first and second person narratives didn’t hit me until halfway through. I read through this book in two sittings and when I went to pick it up the next day I felt like I hadn’t read anything up to that point and it took me a long time to understand and get back into the headspace of the narrative again. Overall, I found this book to be very disorienting, however, part of me wonders if that was intentional. Pedro Paramo is also my first introduction into (or what would eventually be called) magical realism. The whimsical, yet intentional absurdity really made me think about some of the deeper themes that these characters represented. There were several themes that stuck out to me while reading this book. The most prominent ones to me were parenthood/family, judgement, and male power. 

Firstly, I needed to state the obvious that this book centred a lot around the idea of family and fatherhood. To me, Juan's (perceived impossible) mission to find his father symbolized the struggle that children face in connecting with their parents and how parental abandonment could lead to children facing a long road of confusion and dangerous uncertainty. Jumping off from this, I thought the idea of the "classic" caudillo figure or strongman was represented in the character of Pedro. The hold that Pedro had on Comala seemed almost dictatorial in comparison and representative of many of the machismo, strongman figures often associated with Latin American history and fiction. The generational cycle and inheritance of the male figurehead is also referenced by Pedro's relationship with his own father, Miguel. Even the fact that Miguel died by his own horse seems like a wink towards the image of the caudillo age to me. While I know this isn't an Argentinian novel, the image I had my head of these characters is reminiscent of a gaucho which serves as a traditional symbol of masculinity. To me, the death of Pedro and Juan symbolized the death of the strongman and the shift to populism or communal power. This was even foreshadowed when Juan was asked "when will you rest" (20) at the beginning of the novel. This also brings up the age old question of should sons be judged based on the previous expectations, experience or biases of the father.

I wanted to go further about how this town seemed to be like a symbol of purgatory where our peers ultimately judge us for our actions, but it appears I'm hitting the maximum word count. So I'll save it for the class discussion. 

Question for the class: How important does family connection play into who we are as individuals? Is it ethical to be compared to long lost family members that we've never even known?